Thanks for the summary. I don't think it's helpful to have the public (I'm a lifelong resident) vote for technical ballot measures. Sometimes, statewide measures need voter input to pass, unfortunately, leading to voters deciding obscure issues involving state parks or such. That's unfortunate.
#2 appears benign to some degree though I have seen concern that it gives power to regulate vendors without clearly telling the voters that it is doing so. And, overall, some argue 2-6 is a result of a power grab by Eric Adams.
I am wary about #2. #1 is good though it's broader than some might think -- not just associated with sexual equality issues.
This is incredible. Thank you
Thanks for the summary. I don't think it's helpful to have the public (I'm a lifelong resident) vote for technical ballot measures. Sometimes, statewide measures need voter input to pass, unfortunately, leading to voters deciding obscure issues involving state parks or such. That's unfortunate.
#2 appears benign to some degree though I have seen concern that it gives power to regulate vendors without clearly telling the voters that it is doing so. And, overall, some argue 2-6 is a result of a power grab by Eric Adams.
I am wary about #2. #1 is good though it's broader than some might think -- not just associated with sexual equality issues.